I don’t often shed a tear over the news, and even more rarely one of happiness. I really hadn’t expected anything quite so sweeping; I figured there would be a narrow decision requiring states to recognize marriages performed in other states and then punting on the question of equal marriage.
There have already been marriages in downtown Columbus, right out in front of the county courthouse.
And if this isn’t a reminder of the dangers of a Republican administration next year — what kind of person do you want named to the court in case of a vacancy? Someone who believes in equal protection under the law, or another Scalia?
It’s a little weird to contemplate that when I wake up around noon, equal marriage may be the law of the land by Supreme Court decision.
It’s appalling that we can’t be sure of the outcome in this day and age. The correct decision is blindingly, agonizingly obvious, and yet we cannot be sure that the Supreme Court will reach it.
It’s my bedtime now. I really hope that when I wake up, it’s in a better, more equal country.
Funniest thing I’ve seen in a while: voice actor panels at Emerald City Comic Con where they, uh, reinterpret the Star Wars scripts. They’ve got through the first two movies; one hopes they’ll be doing ‘Jedi’ eventually (looks like they didn’t have a voice talent guest list this year). Jim Cummings’ ‘Darth Pooh’ is disturbingly hilarious. :D
Not generally work safe, once they get good and going…
I have a smartphone now.
I can’t say I actually wanted one, but for the price, I’d’ve been a fool not to get it. Android something or another. Still gettin’ used to it. It doesn’t suck, but likewise I am not (yet) overjoyed by the change. Maybe I just need to find the right app to make me go wow.
In the quest for shame that is Ohio’s inability to dispense with its obscene ban on equal marriage comes the ultimate kick in the psychological nuts: Alabama will have gay marriage before we do.
No wonder our state symbol is the buckeye — that’s fucking nuts.
I was thinking about authors whose works I prefer in adaptation to the originals, and the two writers that head that list are Shakespeare, and Lovecraft.
This promptly led to Romeo and Cthuliet. I decline to follow that thought any further. That way madness lies.
Starting this past Thursday, and for the first time in nearly 15 years, I have health insurance. It’s not great, but it’s basic coverage that I can afford.
Prior to the ACA (or Obamacare, if you prefer), the only insurance I was eligible for was both obscenely expensive–about a third of my pay–and covered damn near nothing until I was already five to ten thousand dollars out of pocket, which was money I wouldn’t have been able to save considering the third-of-my-paycheck price tag in the first place.
My coverage is not perfect, and it is not complete, but it means that this fiftysomething will be able to see a doctor for basic and preventative care for the first time in fifteen years, and will not have to rely on luck, optimism, and the emergency room.
What I want to know is this: before you start trying to dismantle the ACA, what program will you have in place to provide the same or better coverage at the same or lower cost? What is your plan for my health coverage, other than hoping that I die before I qualify for Medicare and you can’t block me anymore?
Because I am not giving up my card without a fight. If the new Congress defunds the ACA, then I challenge John Boehner and Mitch McConnell to take my card from me personally and explain to me why full-time working, tax-paying, law-abiding me doesn’t deserve basic medical coverage. I want them to look me in the eye and tell me that.
I’ll tell you what I’m going to do if they defund the ACA and I lose my coverage. I will be submitting my medical bills directly to their offices. If they’re not going to let me buy my own insurance, then my health care is their responsibility to cover.
It would be nice if the report on CIA torture were taken by both sides as an opportunity, a point at which we can say that we, as a nation, are better than that.
Unfortunately, the Republicans (with the exception of John McCain, who knows first hand) have made it clear that they’re just fine with torture, and the Democrats will, as usual, whine a lot and then do nothing.
It would be even nicer if this report came as a surprise, but we’ve known for years: what the rampaging fuck do you think waterboarding is?
What’s the correct thing to do now? Simple. Identify the person who ultimately signed off on this program, and the persons who oversaw its implementation, and ship them off to the Hague for a war crimes trial and let the facts and justice take their course.
The correct thing to do, of course, is pretty much the last thing that will happen.
EDIT: Oh, and here’s your official Faux News spin: Torture’s okay because America is awesome!
While there is no defending Elizabeth Lauten’s comments about Sasha and Malia Obama, she has had the decency to do the proper thing: she has apologized for her remarks and resigned her position, and I applaud her for being the first Republican I can think of in the last 15 years to have acted honorably upon making a gross and offensive error in judgment, rather than try to make like it’s nothing or even okay — or that calling her on it is “intolerant”. I think I’m mostly shocked that a Republican has actually apologized; I’m pretty sure that gets her thrown out of the party.
Now if only all the other Republicans who’ve said deliberately racist, deliberately dishonest, and/or deliberately hateful things about the Obamas would do the same. One suspects that would leave the Congress without a quorum in either house…
Oh, well done. While fucking Utah has marriage equality; I live under the jurisdiction of the only court that thinks institutionalized bigotry is just fine and dandy. By a 2-1 decision, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld the existing equal marriage bans in Ohio, as well as Michigan, Kentucky and Tennessee.
And if Judge Daughtry is right in her blistering dissent (starting at p 43 of the decision),
Because the correct result is so obvious, one is tempted to speculate that the majority has purposefully taken the contrary position to create the circuit split regarding the legality of same-sex marriage that could prompt a grant of certiorari by the Supreme Court and an end to the uncertainty of status and the interstate chaos that the current discrepancy in state laws threatens.
…or in regular English, that the majority is deliberately trying to force the Supreme Court to get involved, that is no comfort. As has been said in many other contexts, justice delayed is justice denied.
My regional appeals court just told me that my state has the Constitutional right to discriminate against me for no reason other than the simple fact that I am gay. Not because I have committed a crime, not because I have been found mentally incompetent, but simply and only because I am gay.
My regional appeals court — or 2/3 of it, anyway — can go fuck itself.